The folks at Obsidian Wings (where I am not allowed to go to make fun of them directly) have been really on a roll with posts by non-lawyers about laws they know nothing about. Recently, it was resident conservatwit Sebastian Holsclaw on judicial interpretation, which was too lame to even comment on.
Today's unintentional hilarity is provided by Edward, who expresses shock and dismay that a man is being forced to pay child support for a child when he had an "oral agreement" with the mother he was donating sperm to that he would be relieved of such obligations. Edward says, "Surely this will be overturned on appeal." Um, no. If you donate sperm to someone you know, you're the daddy. If you want an enforceable oral agreement that will protect you from paternity, come in her mouth. There are laws in certain states that allow unknown donation through a sperm bank to relieve you of parental responsibilities (and rights, it works both ways.) But if you jerk off into a cup so your bestest female friend can do the turkey-baster trick, then you better get a good job, my friend, whether you have something in writing or not.
To be a teensy bit fair to Edward, the article quotes some shmuck from the University of Pennsylvania who says this could happen to anyone who donates sperm. Um, again, no. If there is a law that provides for unknown-donor protection through a sperm bank, it is really, really unlikely to happen. On the other hand, if you "donate" to her some night after a couple of drinks, you're a dad, no matter what she tells you.
Recent Comments