Declarations of Victory
Consider the source, but Politico says:
Not long after the polls close in the May 20 Kentucky and Oregon primaries, Barack Obama plans to declare victory in his bid for the Democratic presidential nomination.
And, until at least May 31 and perhaps longer, Hillary Clinton’s campaign plans to dispute it.
It’s a train wreck waiting to happen ... .
Clinton bloggers are outraged, naturally. One of the most unhinged says, "Why doesn't he declare himself the King of Spain while he's at it?" James Joyner, of all people, talks sense:
[O]ne could argue that not declaring victory after passing the 2,025 threshold would be a tacit admission that Clinton is right.
Yes, one could. Going back to my post about how elections are games:
Like all games, an election has contestants who win or lose by competition, there are rules which set forth the means of measuring who wins and rules which govern the competitive conduct of the contestants, and someone must set the rules in advance and someone must enforce those rules during the game. ... There will [always] be disagreements about rule interpretation and application ... .
If Obama does not claim to have won once he has a majority of the total pledged delegates, he would be abandoning his interpretation of the rules. And if Clinton accepted his victory at that point, she would be too. In this sense, far from being a "trainwreck", it's the normal course of how this particular game is conducted.
Taking the insane Clinton blogger's analogy literally, let's say someone was widely acknowledged to be next in the line of succession to the spanish throne, but there was someone else who claimed to be the rightful heir under a different interpretation of the rules of succession. When the old King dies, both of them would make their claim, believing themselves to be in the right. To do otherwise would be bizarre and self-defeating.
One peculiarity of this game is that the referee might not blow the whistle to end it and announce the winner for a long time after the condition for victory has been met, at the convention in August. But this game also has more than one ref, and more than one way of blowing the whistle - the superdelegates and party leaders, and the losing candidate accepting defeat, respectively. Given that the last primaries are only two weeks after Obama will (presumably) claim victory, I think those alternate refs will wait until then and declare him the winner shortly thereafter.






Recent Comments