| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
« "A Shitty Bill Passed, And It's a Miracle" | Main | Local Programming: SEPTA Strike Ends »
Two otherwise identical packages of a product available at Trader Joe's in Center City Philadelphia:
With wildly different nutrition information on the back:
Based on comparison to similar products, I believe the label with the higher calories is correct. This is not the first time I have encountered this problem with Trader Joe's brand items. It's happened to others, too. If you shop there and read labels, watch out.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c68d353ef0120a65d00f3970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Trader Joe's Ongoing Nutrition Mislabeling Problem:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
At least the fiber is consistent! Does it matter that I WANT them to have only 130 calories and 4.5 grams of fat (although 8 of the 4.5 grams manages to be saturated)?
Posted by: PennyDreadful | November 12, 2009 at 02:46 AM